X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:38:15 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl: Net::DNS requires Win32::IPHelper
Message-ID:	<20100824083815.GO6726@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1282535618 DOT 6888 DOT 51 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <AANLkTimGT6cp8z-dAS=YHZM4fcOwi-Fn4xZtDL=tKhWS AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100823140705 DOT GG6726 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1282583279 DOT 5256 DOT 8 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1282583279.5256.8.camel@YAAKOV04>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug 23 12:07, Yaakov S wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 16:07 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Here's a question:
> > 
> > Why does the Net::DNS module, which provides only a resolver API, depend
> > on a Win32-related package at all?  Cygwin 1.7 provides a BSD compatible
> > resolver API (res_init, res_query, etc) which should be used, just like
> > on Linux.  Does the module erroneously treat Cygwin as Windows target?
> > If so, that should be fixed.
> 
> Net::DNS does not bind libresolv on *NIX; it does its own parsing
> of /etc/resolv.conf.  On Win32, it uses Win32::IPHelper's bindings of
> GetNetworkParams.
> 
> So this is YA resolver implementation.  When it came to BIND's liblwres,
> you asked that it use the Windows APIs in order to ore closely match our
> libresolv implementation and not require an /etc/resolv.conf.  The same
> would apply here as well.

Ok, right.  I still don't understand why it makes sense to implement
another resolver when the system resolver functions exist, though...


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -