delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/08/20/13:59:10

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:58:58 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug tracker
Message-ID: <20100820175858.GA17132@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4C6C1B01 DOT 4020808 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818182641 DOT GB22698 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C6C4372 DOT 2070701 AT blunn DOT org> <20100818205009 DOT GK11340 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C6D17E0 DOT 5010506 AT blunn DOT org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi AT 4ax DOT com> <20100819141948 DOT GB19001 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <cmfq66p4d2s88u1foj5s7d13ucg2oda29i AT 4ax DOT com> <AANLkTikdO70873x2vDKubxb1LtkzHubbJ4qvsoz-Ox=E AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikdO70873x2vDKubxb1LtkzHubbJ4qvsoz-Ox=E@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:47:33PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>2010/8/19 Andrew Schulman:
>>> The question is if the maintainers really want that, and cgf and I are
>>> just 2 out of ~60 maintainers, maintaining over 1400 packages. ?From
>>> these ~60 maintainers we have quite a few who either don't reply to any
>>> mail about their package, or who only reply after some nudging.
>>
>> Agreed, but OTOH I'd guess that half of all of the bugs reported on this
>> list are for just two packages: cygwin and setup.exe. ?If the maintainers
>> of those two packages think a bug tracker would be useful, we should make
>> one. ?If they don't, it's probably not worth bothering.
>
>setup already has a tracker, using the official sourceware bugzilla.
>  http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/
>used rarely
>
>Product cygwin - Component setup.exe
>  http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=cygwin&component=setup.exe
>
>I have no idea how one can interface bugzilla or any other tracker to
>our package - maintainer list:
>  http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint

Just to be clear: The above URL is not intended as a mechanism for
people to send private messages to package maintainers.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019