X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinAWLxfE0KcQMhD0jAfXAygYNW1WfO3ZJMJ0UpM@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<i4f3ve$uoq$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4C6B16A2 DOT 6000509 AT redhat DOT com> <AANLkTinAWLxfE0KcQMhD0jAfXAygYNW1WfO3ZJMJ0UpM AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:19:59 +0100
Message-ID:	<AANLkTikzTw8e7zKAUaMak5H8P2WRJwr5GzW4hyuk1pAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Upgrading to cygwin 1.7.6 vs gcc 4.5
From:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 18 August 2010 06:25, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 00:09, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/17/2010 04:54 PM, Ross Smith wrote:
>>> I've installed the experimental gcc 4.5 packages (because that's the
>>> version I'm using in all my other development environments, and it's
>>> nice not to have to target multiple compiler versions any more), but now
>>> that cygwin dll 1.7.6 is out, I can't seem to find a way to upgrade
>>> cygwin without also downgrading gcc. In the installer, if I select
>>> Current I get the new cygwin but the old gcc, while if I select
>>> Experimental, it keeps the new gcc but doesn't offer me the new cygwin.
>>>
>>> At the moment I'm sticking with the old cygwin, because the gcc upgrade
>>> is more important to me than the cygwin upgrade. Is there some way I'm
>>> missing to select both, or do I just have to accept that I can't upgrade
>>> anything else until the official gcc 4.5 is ready?
>>
>> Stay on the 'Curr' (not 'Exp'), click 'View' until you are on the
>> Pending page, then cycle on the string next to each gcc package until it
>> says Keep instead of the downgraded version number.
>
> I'd recommend selecting the 'Exp' button actually. That ensures that
> all dependencies of gcc, e.g. libgcc and libffi, are upgraded to 4.5
> too. (It's yet another flaw of setup.exe that it doesn't automatically
> upgrade dependencies of experimental versions accordingly.)

Scratch that. I hadn't realised that if you select 'Exp',
non-experimental packages no longer get updated, which of course is
exactly what the OP was saying. This is awful.

Andy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -