X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-RZG-AUTH:	:KG0SfETmd/55bSarYSJgwI+Iuho+dmriAET02FbxHfH5Wq24EeswIqWI4Q==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID:	em00
Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:33:58 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id:	<201008121233.o7CCXwQl009772@post.webmailer.de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"David Law" <david DOT law AT apconsult DOT de>
Subject:	Re: CygWin Security &amp; Performance Issues
X-Abuse:	59408 / 217.6.95.140
X-RZG-MBID:	1GDJeZU5ML2+yk8KKCAB5FAKcYkKv79K7lQE/1Xh2n8=
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Did anyone have any thoughts about the security side of the question:
do I have more, less or exactly the same rights?

Best regards,
DaveLaw

----- original message --------

Subject: CygWin Security & Performance Issues
Sent: Thu, 12 Aug 2010
From: David Law<david DOT law AT apconsult DOT de>

>   Hello List,
>=20
> about 18 months ago we recommended cygwin as a unix-like
> environment for a Windows 2003 Server to our Admin.
>=20
> This was turned down on the grounds that it did not satisfy
> the security requirements of our organisation. (unfortunately
> I don't know the details as I wasn't involved in the process)
>=20
> Instead, the "Subsystem for Unix-based Applications" was chosen.
>=20
> I am now trying to port a fairly simple shell script to SUA
> and find massive performance problems: under cygwin the script
> runs for about 20 minutes on my notebook, but under SUA it takes
> about 2 days on our Zillion-core 2003 Server!!
>=20
> Firstly, I was wondering if SUA maybe has a reputation for
> bad performance, or could it maybe be the architecture of
> desktop contra server pc's?
> Would you expect better performance from cygwin?
>=20
> Secondly, how do you see cygwin's compliance with a Windows
> Server security infrastructure?  Is a user limited to just
> the same as under windows or can they somehow access other
> users data they otherwise couldn't?  I noticed in cygwin 1.7
> there is something called LSA Authentication. Does this address
> these issues?
>=20
> Thanks in advance,
> DaveLaw
>=20
>=20
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>=20
>=20

--- original message end ----


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -