delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: | true |
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: | v=1.0 c=1 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=bjc4cVg0bOkbQAORHc9k3w==:17 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=VR9OJVyXHM3lkxL5_1UA:9 a=nrOrabMUsnR0Q-nEHyYkW1d5JbAA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9m-hJAl0gB8A:10 |
Message-ID: | <4C5CA945.6070601@monai.ca> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:31:01 -0700 |
From: | Steven Monai <steve+cygwin AT monai DOT ca> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: The dirent struct |
References: | <AANLkTimghbyew2f+Q1fSTfpzv0cw7CrypX60vcW0Qgyb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100806134005 DOT GD22459 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100806141140 DOT GC31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTimnMASSuyv4mXtt3x8d=NZMg4y1DuCfT4Jr44Qt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100806163925 DOT GE31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100806173153 DOT GB23627 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100806182832 DOT GH31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTimEG2YeQfNBGNSp7DAS69wf9x+6W_WUQEwu0mE- AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTimEG2YeQfNBGNSp7DAS69wf9x+6W_WUQEwu0mE-@mail.gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 2010/08/06 11:48 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > I've decided to take a different approach and decided to implement it > as follows: > > #ifdef __CYGWIN__ > itr->d_fileno = entry->d_ino; > itr->d_reclen = strlen(entry->d_name); > #else > itr->d_fileno = entry->d_fileno; > itr->d_reclen = entry->d_reclen; > #endif > > I assume this is appropriate? No, not according to this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-09/msg00031.html Quoting cgf from there: "Defining d_*rec*len as strlen(d_name) would not be correct since that is supposed to be the length of the record not the name." BTW, I look forward to trying out rtorrent in Cygwin. I am quite familiar with rtorrent, as I use it quite often in Linux. -SM -- -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |