X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20100806182832.GH31783@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<AANLkTimghbyew2f+Q1fSTfpzv0cw7CrypX60vcW0Qgyb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100806134005 DOT GD22459 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100806141140 DOT GC31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <AANLkTimnMASSuyv4mXtt3x8d=NZMg4y1DuCfT4Jr44Qt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100806163925 DOT GE31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100806173153 DOT GB23627 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100806182832 DOT GH31783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:48:13 -0400
Message-ID:	<AANLkTimEG2YeQfNBGNSp7DAS69wf9x+6W_WUQEwu0mE-@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: The dirent struct
From:	Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6 August 2010 14:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug =A06 13:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:39:25PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >Btw., d_fileno is just another old name for d_ino. =A0The Linux headers
>> >defines it thus as `#define d_fileno d_ino'. =A0We can do the same in
>> >Cygwin. =A0Maybe that minimizes some porting effort.
>>
>> Huh. =A0I thought the d_fileno actually stood for the file handle of the
>> opened directory.
>
> The Linux headers suggest that it was an old BSD name.

I've decided to take a different approach and decided to implement it
as follows:

#ifdef __CYGWIN__
    itr->d_fileno =3D entry->d_ino;
    itr->d_reclen =3D strlen(entry->d_name);
#else
    itr->d_fileno =3D entry->d_fileno;
    itr->d_reclen =3D entry->d_reclen;
#endif

I assume this is appropriate?

Chris

--=20
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -