X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:40:05 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: The dirent struct
Message-ID:	<20100806134005.GD22459@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<AANLkTimghbyew2f+Q1fSTfpzv0cw7CrypX60vcW0Qgyb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTimghbyew2f+Q1fSTfpzv0cw7CrypX60vcW0Qgyb@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:33:41AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>I'm well in to the process of porting rtorrent to Cygwin but I've hit
>a bit of a snag with the dirent struct.  Namely:
>
>/usr/src/rtorrent/rtorrent-0.8.6-1/src/rtorrent-0.8.6/src/utils/directory.cc:79:
>error: ?struct dirent? has no member named ?d_fileno?
>/usr/src/rtorrent/rtorrent-0.8.6-1/src/rtorrent-0.8.6/src/utils/directory.cc:80:
>error: ?struct dirent? has no member named ?d_reclen?
>
>which sure enough, the Cygwin dirent struct does not:
>
>struct dirent
>{
>  long __d_version;			/* Used internally */
>  __ino64_t d_ino;
>  unsigned char d_type;
>  unsigned char __d_unused1[3];
>  __uint32_t __d_internal1;
>  char d_name[NAME_MAX + 1];
>};
>
>I assume d_fileno and d_reclen may be part of __d_unused1 or
>__d_internal1?  I'd appreciate some help here, since I'm not sure what
>to do at this point.

No, they are not part of either of those fields.  If they were
they would be exposed.

They simply are not implemented.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -