delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PSBL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk |
Message-ID: | <4C5AFC52.7090500@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:00:50 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Re: Setup.exe update confusion |
References: | <AANLkTim3p30Pr9Jy3FUs3-=Hz5K9JGUxz6qDRO-xC0jp AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTi=_we_4KUFN4SLvmV196AsMC1VbMeVUtO4wgige AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTimhpeguSzMTXYei0_U=5zwHddPk_P3Rd5=1VXsO AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTimhpeguSzMTXYei0_U=5zwHddPk_P3Rd5=1VXsO@mail.gmail.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 8/5/2010 1:26 PM, Steven Collins wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:13, DePriest, Jason R.<> wrote: <snip> >> In Gmail, I do it manually. It only takes a few seconds. >> >> However, I did just submit an enhancement request for an option to >> auto-obfuscate email addresses in forwards and replies. <snip> > Unfortunately it has already been submitted many times, but Google has > never responded. I expect that's true. But if it's like some other large, successful software companies I've seen, a single request for a feature falls pretty low on the priority list unless there's an internal (or sometimes external) champion. Without that, it's the sheer number of requests for a feature that tip the balance. So I'd encourage you to add your "+1" to any existing request, if that's possible, or to submit your own. Often these things just come down to the perceived demand. Google may respond if they see a line forming. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |