delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/07/27/15:11:34

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:11:19 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Request for feature: more flexible setup routine
Message-ID: <20100727191118.GD3387@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <30EAF1C130A74F97AC4C82B42ED55DAE AT hometoshiba> <20100725025446 DOT GA17000 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTik0XnKsCvq_moPP60Dm95qvnDcm8346+01EaHyt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1179889566 DOT 20100726133244 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <AANLkTi=CGdn6n2LQ5h6M7rTsDL8-949ZvZQ3oR==C1dY AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100726142944 DOT GA28399 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTikPv8YSQz=j=xjmM2bi_UkLmzCKHvBVbvDUpaVX AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100726170943 DOT GB28592 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTim1CwRTmFC192xD78GsJ5S=C8T1M-2RcJMgsBuU AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim1CwRTmFC192xD78GsJ5S=C8T1M-2RcJMgsBuU@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 26 July 2010 18:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> If we wanted to do something like this I think it would have to be a
>>>> separate dialog where the user makes a decision about what they want.
>>>> Either that or a list of packages to update would always be presented
>>>> so that people wouldn't be surprised.
>>>
>>>Agreed, but of course that'd need substantial design and
>>>implementation work, so realistically it isn't gonna happen.
>>
>> AFAIK, the latter, where a list of what's being updated is shown isn't a
>> substantial redesign.
>
>Can you elaborate? Do you mean adding a new screen before the package
>selection screen?

No, a screen after the package selection which shows all of the packages
which are being installed - which is, I guess, basically what is now
(until your rename change goes live) the "Partial" view.

That's how linux package managers do it.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019