X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:21:48 +0400
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru>
Reply-To:	Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<6510044973.20100726232148@mtu-net.ru>
To:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Request for feature: more flexible setup routine
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTi=CGdn6n2LQ5h6M7rTsDL8-949ZvZQ3oR==C1dY@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<30EAF1C130A74F97AC4C82B42ED55DAE AT hometoshiba> <20100725025446 DOT GA17000 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTik0XnKsCvq_moPP60Dm95qvnDcm8346+01EaHyt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1179889566 DOT 20100726133244 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <AANLkTi=CGdn6n2LQ5h6M7rTsDL8-949ZvZQ3oR==C1dY AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

Greetings, Andy Koppe!

>>> This makes me wonder whether Keep shouldn't be the default, on the
>>> principle that programs shouldn't do anything unless the user asks for
>>> it.
>>
>> Strange principle.

> It's the "Principle of Least Surprise".


>> Setup is intended to install/update Cygwin installation.
>> Of course it offer to update whatever is available for update.
>> Why shouldn't it?

> Yes, of course it should offer them, the issue is that it
> clandestinely sticks them into users' shopping trolleys and then makes
> them pay for it. At least some users do get surprised by setup.exe
> pre-selecting updates without making that obvious, such that the first
> they know about it is when large packages they didn't pick start
> downloading. (Setup.exe's behaviour is of course documented, alas,
> manuals don't usually get read until there are problems, if at all.)

> Having said that, I do think that encouraging users to update to the
> latest versions is a good thing, but it would be nice to do it less
> sneakily. I don't know how though.

> Remembering the Keep/Curr/Prev/Exp setting across setup.exe
> invocations would just make it easier for users like the OP to opt out
> of updates.

The summary page with expected download size listed wouldn't be bad addition,
I agree.


--
WBR,
 Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 26.07.2010, <23:20>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -