X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:09:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Request for feature: more flexible setup routine
Message-ID:	<20100726170943.GB28592@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<30EAF1C130A74F97AC4C82B42ED55DAE AT hometoshiba> <20100725025446 DOT GA17000 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTik0XnKsCvq_moPP60Dm95qvnDcm8346+01EaHyt AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1179889566 DOT 20100726133244 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <AANLkTi=CGdn6n2LQ5h6M7rTsDL8-949ZvZQ3oR==C1dY AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100726142944 DOT GA28399 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTikPv8YSQz=j=xjmM2bi_UkLmzCKHvBVbvDUpaVX AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTikPv8YSQz=j=xjmM2bi_UkLmzCKHvBVbvDUpaVX@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 04:15:19PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 26 July 2010 15:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:52:48PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> If we wanted to do something like this I think it would have to be a
>> separate dialog where the user makes a decision about what they want.
>> Either that or a list of packages to update would always be presented
>> so that people wouldn't be surprised.
>
>Agreed, but of course that'd need substantial design and
>implementation work, so realistically it isn't gonna happen.

AFAIK, the latter, where a list of what's being updated is shown isn't a
substantial redesign.

>Okay, detour over.
>
>Now what about my actual proposal, which was to save the
>Keep/Curr/Prev/Exp setting across setup.exe invocations?

I think making it sticky would lead to the confusion that I previously
mentioned so I'm not in favor of it.

However, I don't feel so strongly that I'd actually veto the change
if others think it is important.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -