delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:33:01 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: section 2 man pages |
Message-ID: | <20100723213301.GA11099@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4C499A0B DOT 3060508 AT redhat DOT com> <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F201273096 AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F201273096@A1DAL1SWPES19MB.ams.acs-inc.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:05:17PM -0500, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >> From: Eric Blake >> On 07/23/2010 07:19 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >> > Are section 2 man pages available? >> >> Not at the moment. Volunteers welcome to help provide them. >> Meanwhile, >> I find that the POSIX specification is good enough (at least, for using >> interfaces portably): >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/write.html > >Hmm, I'd have thought they'd come downstream like so much else. Since >all this stuff is open source, I wouldn't think that there should be >any plagiarizing issues, right? I see, however, that the referenced >web page is copyrighted. So, I wonder who is responsible if a volun- >teer plagiarizes another source for Cygwin. I'm thinking some rules >ought to be promulgated before volunteers are solicited. Cygwin's licensing should be fairly clear. And you'd have to check with the licensing of something like the above to see if it *can* be copied. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |