X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4C3418DE.2070807@tlinx.org>
Date:	Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:04:14 -0700
From:	Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>, "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ln -- is there a way to get the old behavior back? (ENV var?)
References:	<950438242 DOT 402151278480997561 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT zmail04 DOT collab DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<950438242.402151278480997561.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
X-Stationery:	0.5.1
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake wrote:
> As is, your question didn't make much sense to me; please
> show a transcript of exact command line sequences showing what you
> are trying to accomplish and why you think that cygwin isn't
> doing the right thing, rather than just describing it in words.
---
Will do --- I may have confused myself.

I have a bunch of links in a home dir, and I though they were cygwin hard
links -- which I thought had been changed to be different from the NTFS
hard links so that tar and such could back them up.  Ug...Now that I think
about it, it's the soft links that were changed to be different from
the WinExplorer links...oh...frack...

Never mind...

Though I still liked the symbolic links the old way -- from what I remember,
as they'd work in windows explorer, but that's not what I was asking for
never mind!...*blush*...

Hey...I have fs problems on the brain (though they are more linux fs problems
than Win fs problems this time...stressful, since my linux server has been 
my bedrock -- and to have it act up! .. my world is unstable!

sorry for the confusion!
linda


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -