delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4C32853D.1040605@cs.umass.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:22:05 -0400 |
From: | Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
Reply-To: | moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Q: rebaseall/rebaseperl ? |
References: | <op DOT vfdhy7w71e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de> <4C3249EC DOT 9010404 AT laposte DOT net> <op DOT vfd2zb0y1e62zd AT merlin DOT emma DOT line DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <op.vfd2zb0y1e62zd@merlin.emma.line.org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 7/5/2010 5:22 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 05.07.2010, 23:09 Uhr, schrieb Cyrille Lefevre: >> any reasons why rebaseall and rebase perl aren't executed at compile >> time ? or at packaging time ? > > Probably because it's not possible to oversee which installation would > need which libraries later, and because you'd have to have a registry, > or algorithm to derive base addresses, for each and every potential > library. Meaning: not manageable with reasonable effort. Put another way, the exact addresses and spacing needed vary with platform and perhaps according to other stuff installed, so it would be hard to do in advance. It *might* be possible to do it as part of setup on an individual platform, i.e., *technically* feasible, but I expect it would be *managerially* a nightmare, since it is a somewhat complicated thing that gives people more room to screw up ... Regards -- Eliot -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |