X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Subject:	Re: Need swig 1.3.40 for Subversion
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4C224A9C.3050500@acm.org>
References:	<4C1FD3E8 DOT 50308 AT acm DOT org> <1277260203 DOT 5496 DOT 36 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4C224A9C DOT 3050500 AT acm DOT org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:06:01 -0500
Message-ID:	<1277323561.5452.81.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 10:55 -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
> It doesn't build with swig 2.0.0 and I don't have time to investigate
> why. The swig bindings are generated fine, but they don't compile.

SWIG is *very* annoying.  Why can't they keep some sort of compatibility
between versions?

Alright, I suppose I'll have to package 1.3.40 as curr:, but as I
already built 2.0.0 I'll make it test:.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -