delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/06/23/13:55:55

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4C224A9C.3050500@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:55:40 -0700
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Need swig 1.3.40 for Subversion
References: <4C1FD3E8 DOT 50308 AT acm DOT org> <1277260203 DOT 5496 DOT 36 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To: <1277260203.5496.36.camel@YAAKOV04>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6/22/2010 7:30 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 14:04 -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
>> It seems that swig-1.3.38 has a bug that produces invalid Python
>> bindings with Python 2.6. I first hit this when building
>> subversion-1.6.11-2 for Python 2.6, but I dismissed the test case
>> failures at the time.
>>
>> Today I built subversion-1.6.12-1 and took the time to investigate. The
>> Python bindings won't run when generated with swig 1.3.38 but run fine
>> when generated with 1.3.40.
>>
>> Therefore, I respectively request that the swig maintainer update swig
>> to 1.3.40. (I believe swig 2.0.0 was just release, but I have no idea if
>> Subversion will build with that version.)
> 
> Would you mind trying with 2.0.0?  I uploaded a package here:

It doesn't build with swig 2.0.0 and I don't have time to investigate
why. The swig bindings are generated fine, but they don't compile.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

"Nuclear war would really set back cable."
                -- Ted Turner

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019