X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:47:34 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 'cp' utility bug when <dest-name>.exe file exist.
Message-ID:	<20100609154734.GA18851@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<AANLkTil0pNuO4a9n2Ln5H3Q0cJRdQER7NlgSTg2a9EN2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <OFCB72527D DOT F8E42EE2-ON8525773C DOT 0058E3E2-8525773C DOT 0059F451 AT lnotes-gw DOT ent DOT nwie DOT net> <1276042636 DOT 1651 DOT 9 DOT camel AT erebor> <AANLkTil6fa2-stL9f3hd-Dg-X6FjzVKLeG56lPoI7OYp AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100609044034 DOT GB9305 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AANLkTikJ9U3U49HlT9Ldm6aueX3z22gN_6L95P-E2Pwz AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTinrgelZ5PcMhWjzehe8sa-cjkGoiFI8WpLGNh84 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTimh8Kzu14RAhlzYl6FBl6nOdXNY2JMIug7b_v-X AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C0F9535 DOT 7010902 AT redhat DOT com> <AANLkTinO8GJY9d9SIy-unGW1yrPqGjvNmo5oj5-t2zsC AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<AANLkTinO8GJY9d9SIy-unGW1yrPqGjvNmo5oj5-t2zsC@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:02:16PM +0100, Julio Costa wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 14:20, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> Have you ever encountered a makefile that doesn't consistently use
>> $(EXEEXT) everywhere? ??Too many people just expect 'gcc -o foo ...' to
>> produce foo, then 'strip foo' to work, without realizing that on cygwin,
>> gcc created 'foo.exe' and strip _has_ to have .exe magic.
>
>That's just one of the several scenarios which would greatly benefit
>from a removal of .exe magic.

Uh, no.  That would BREAK makefiles.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -