| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On 6/4/2010 12:37 PM, Christopher Wingert wrote: > So here is an example of a performance gain by not using cygwin stat(). I > did this patch in about an hour (with the help of some git code), so I > wouldn't recommend it for any production use. > > On a dry run rsync from my local drive to my NAS (105GB, 34k files, 4k > directories). The current release cygwin rsync did it in [36m:43s], with > the patch (below) applied, it dropped to [04m:48s]. But your patch only does a portion of the work that stat() is supposed to do. I don't think there's any question that ignoring the need to fill in certain stat fields will save time. But that's not really a workable alternative either, if that's what you're implying. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |