X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4C07E7EC.6040405@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:35:40 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal
References:	<20100603004331 DOT eehneofq8kos4ccw AT webmail DOT 12000 DOT org> <4C07C578 DOT 306 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C07D931 DOT 3080905 AT 12000 DOT org>
In-reply-to:	<4C07D931.3080905@12000.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6/3/2010 12:32 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> On 6/3/2010 8:08 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, nma AT 12000 DOT org wrote:
>>> perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete
>>
>> That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming.
>>
>
> I did the following:
> 1. reinstalled.
> 2. tried different source, downloaded, reinstalled
>
> I still get the same thing, that perl-ming is Incomplete.
>
> Anything else I can try? or any other information I can provide to help
> resolve this? When I first installed cygwin, I installed everything. I
> did this from http://mirrors.kernel.org initially, and now from some
> other cygwin source.
>
> Is someone else getting this "Incomplete" on perl-ming?

Yeah, I am.  Perhaps it's just a red-herring.  A quick check doesn't
indicate anything is missing.  I'd say just ignore it or uninstall it
(unless you need SWF support).

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -