X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4BE20D67.3040707@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 May 2010 01:29:27 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin make target is never determined up to date
References:	<28454344 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4BE0F722 DOT 1040009 AT bopp DOT net> <28456659 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4BE0FC52 DOT 80708 AT bopp DOT net> <4BE11A07 DOT 1040308 AT gmail DOT com> <28467628 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4BE20556 DOT 8040705 AT gmail DOT com> <28467801 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<28467801.post@talk.nabble.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 06/05/2010 00:46, MichaelKim wrote:
> At the moment I have Win7 with version 1.7.5. Most of the time the timestamps
> of dir and inside file are exactly same.

  Ah.  The fact that the timestamps *look* the same when shown in the output
of a "dir" or "ls" command doesn't mean they're actually the same when
compared to the nearest 100ns, which is the accuracy of the underlying NTFS
file timestamps.

> Have WinXP with version 1.5.19 where the timestamps are _always_ the same.
> The one at home Win7, which is _always_ dir has newer timestamp I believe
> again 1.7.5, same as the one I mentioned above.

  I think that's probably the cause of the difference.  I haven't
double-checked in the archives, but I'm reasonably sure that's it: old 1.5
never used to update the directory timestamps - as is actually required by the
POSIX spec, so 1.7 is doing the right thing, even though it's in some ways
less convenient!

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -