X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Paul Bibbings <paul DOT bibbings AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: How to uninstall Cygwin/X (only)
Date:	Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:56:19 +0100
Lines:	32
Message-ID:	<877hoheypo.fsf@gmail.com>
References:	<r2keb3a2d501004081157x916548ebu8e4c17c46953e322 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4BBE2F37 DOT 1060303 AT cygwin DOT com> <83y6gx330e DOT fsf AT torus DOT sehlabs DOT com> <83tyrl32lq DOT fsf AT torus DOT sehlabs DOT com> <4BBE886F DOT 409 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4BBE99F4 DOT 2080405 AT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn <d DOT  DOT  DOT  AT googlemail DOT com> writes:

> On 09/04/2010 02:52, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>> Hmm.  I wonder if a quick-n-dirty way to "fix" this is to add a
>> right-click context menu to the spinner, so that you can directly choose
>> "Uninstall" without traversing the entire cycle.  Rinse and repeat on
>> all the items you want to remove...
>
>   I am writing a patch to add a right-click context menu to the spinner :)
> more news in the next couple of days.
>
>     cheers,
>       DaveK

If by "add a right-click context menu to the spinner" you intend to
retain the current problematic behaviour of the spinner but add the
context menu by way of avoiding the noted problems of cycling through
`uninstall', then I would, as a user, see that as an inconsistency.  I
would expect the two to be alternative ways of achieving the same thing
and regard the (presumably) silent difference to be a design flaw.  I may
be missing something, but I'm wondering how it is that, if the pass
through `install' can put in all the dependencies, continuing to
`uninstall' can't just take them out again?

Regards

Paul Bibbings

[p.s. Many sincere apologies to Dave for having hit the wrong button and
sent this reply initially to his private address.]



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -