X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<z2q71a5be031004062127hdf61addds734cf420111c96b6@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<announce DOT 20100404152209 DOT GA31490 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100404212837 DOT GA13198 AT onderneming10 DOT xs4all DOT nl> <4BB9944D DOT 5000005 AT gmail DOT com> <20100405142008 DOT GA10449 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 1004051023080 DOT 15933 AT panix1 DOT panix DOT com> <op DOT vaqpdgru1e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de> <20100406141326 DOT GC16409 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <z2q71a5be031004062127hdf61addds734cf420111c96b6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Apr 2010 06:31:44 +0100
Message-ID:	<r2s416096c61004062231te2416cc4mb5915623c7990396@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.7.3-1
From:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Rurik Christiansen:
>> So, did anyone actually read my response here about how this wouldn't
>> work for Cygwin? =C2=A0If so, you'd have to think that these responses w=
ere
>> pretty off-topic.
>
> Actually I did but I gracefully disagree :)
>
> Strictly speaking you are technically perfectly correct.
>
> Humans however are technically imperfect creatures and so we like to
> give names even to collection of things that are ambiguous.

Due to the reasons cgf described, the file in question couldn't
contain much else but the output of 'uname -r', which incidentally is
part of the POSIX standard and hence available on every Unix/Linux,
whereas /etc/*release is not.

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/uname.html

So please just use that.

Andy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -