X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:16:16 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Tim McDaniel <tmcd AT panix DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.7.3-1
In-Reply-To:	<20100405164613.GA10901@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-ID:	<Pine.NEB.4.64.1004051211380.4438@panix3.panix.com>
References:	<announce DOT 20100404152209 DOT GA31490 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100404212837 DOT GA13198 AT onderneming10 DOT xs4all DOT nl> <4BB9944D DOT 5000005 AT gmail DOT com> <20100405142008 DOT GA10449 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 1004051023080 DOT 15933 AT panix1 DOT panix DOT com> <20100405164613 DOT GA10901 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 10:32:53AM -0500, Tim McDaniel wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:42:05PM +1000, Rurik Christiansen wrote:
>>>> * How do I know what the current release is ? (e.g. is there
>>>> something like /etc/redhat-release or whatever ? The docs mention
>>>> /var/log/setup ... but is not clear at all)
>>>
>>> ... Otherwise, as Dave Korn suggests, you can *read the website*.
>>
>> I suppose that "/etc/redhat-release" is not as well-known a concept as
>> he or I had thought.
>
> You're assuming too much.

Given that several people replied with information about the version
available on the Web (though often also mentioning information on
local versions), I think not.

> The Cygwin distribution doesn't come from Red Hat so calling
> something /etc/redhat-release wouldn't make much sense.

Which is why the original question had "e.g.", "something like", and
"whatever", and I wrote "concept".

Thank you for the information on multiple version numbers with Cygwin,
and how a single identifier would not make much sense.

-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd AT panix DOT com

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -