X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject:	Re: chmod fails for MS-DOS style path in cygwin 1.7.2-2
Date:	Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:03:34 -0700
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<hp2ck7$rpv$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:	<659733 DOT 98534 DOT qm AT web94508 DOT mail DOT in2 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20100401142149 DOT GA30847 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4
In-Reply-To:	<20100401142149.GA30847@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
X-Stationery:	0.5.1
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 04/01/2010 07:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:09:29PM +0530, prakash babu wrote:
>> I am using cygwin 1.7.2-2 and chmod fails for MS-DOS style path with 
>> the following error message.
>>
>> eg: chmod 755 C:\\FileName
>>
>> cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\FileName
>> Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/c/FileName
>> CYGWIN environment variable option "nodosfilewarning" turns off this 
>> warning.
>> Consult the user's guide for more details about POSIX paths:
>> http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames
>>
>> This used to work in cygwin 1.5 .
>>
>> Is there any workaround available for this currently ?
>>
>> Is this a bug in 1.7 which will be fixed in the upcoming versions ?
>
> How could a specific error message, which tells you how to turn it 
> off, be construed as a bug?
Maybe a bug as in "this bothers me". Sorta like the feeling I get when I 
hear, IMHO, the stupid message "It is not necessary to dial a 1 when 
calling this number". My thoughts tend to run "If you know the problem - 
and have the solution - why the #$&* are you telling me?!?". To me a 
better wording of that message would be "Did you know you do not need to 
dial a 1 when calling this number", but that does leave a question of 
"well exactly which (US) numbers do I need the 1 for and which don't I? 
How do I tell?"

I understand this is a warning message and I can easily turn it off, 
etc. I'm just saying...
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Advice - Do not use a hatchet to remove a fly from your forehead.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -