delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:37:56 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: recvfrom + MSG_PEEK = broken? |
Message-ID: | <20100322173756.GB15808@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4BA7085D DOT 3050307 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100322110352 DOT GA32321 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4BA78525 DOT 5080206 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100322160100 DOT GA7186 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20100322160100.GA7186@calimero.vinschen.de> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:01:00PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mar 22 10:56, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 3/22/2010 7:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > On Mar 22 02:04, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >> I've been tracking down a problem in xinetd. It appears to be an issue >> >> with using MSG_PEEK in recvfrom() on UDP sockets. >> > >> > Yes, that's a bug in Cygwin. The socket event handling got messed up >> > when MSG_PEEK was used. I fixed that in CVS so it will be in 1.7.2. >> >> Confirmed: fixes both my testcase, and the error in xinetd. Thanks for >> the quick turnaround! I was about ready to pull my hair out on this > >Sure. I'm glad I had a simple testcase for a socket problem. If only >somebody would come up with an equally simple testcase for the rsync >problem... I thought the rsync problem was due to the fact that select for write on pipes is unreliable. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |