X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenko AT bifit DOT com DOT ua>
Subject:	Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ with -std=c99
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:35:46 +0200
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<ho7v83$mju$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:	<ho7prb$vj9$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4BA771E3 DOT 2080505 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
In-Reply-To:	<4BA771E3.2080505@sbcglobal.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2010.03.22 15:34, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2010-03-22 13:03Z, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
>>
>>     $ gcc -std=c99 -c -o grid.o grid.c
> [...]
>> grid.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strupr'.
>
> I'd expect that warning, because C99 defines no strupr() function.
>
Ok.

But that the way to say to gcc use extended functions?

By -std=gnu99? This function available only if
exist corresponding prototype in header and libc
contain func realization.

As I know libc and system header is not always part of GCC.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -