X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4BA5AAA3.5060606@slittle.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:12:03 +1100
From:	scott <t9zqzy4c AT slittle DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin vs Via C3: nothing happens, no output
References:	<4BA452E4 DOT 7050600 AT slittle DOT com> <4BA4E1B2 DOT 3020507 AT gmail DOT com> <4BA54492 DOT 8050903 AT slittle DOT com> <416096c61003202058s40c2f423p2fff76df652981f5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<416096c61003202058s40c2f423p2fff76df652981f5@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

>> According to the internets... the C3 purports to be a i686-class
>> processor
> Without CMOV or out-of-order execution, that seems a bit of a scam.
[snip]
> For gcc, "i686" implies the presence of the CMOV instruction, because,
> well, CMOV was introduced with the Intel 686 (aka Pentium Pro). 

What's in a name?  GCC can define it as march=hamburger but that doesn't
make it so, it's just a name of convenience/convention.  I assume
Intel's specs/contracts define what is/can be called an i686, so if they
say it's optional then the C3 is still a legit i686 even if CMOV support
is more common.

> Btw, that was almost fifteen years ago.

Well, if ya wanna make a fanless i686 (ish) CPU that runs on five (5)
watts or less, you gotta leave a few things out.

This just means my legacy app is stuck on a 60watt beigebox instead
(since VirtualBox's serial port support is broken).

Thanks anyway.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -