Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/03/17/20:54:35
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:58:07PM -0700, Steven Monai wrote:
>On 2010/03/17 8:06 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Since I haven't seen any guarantees that adding https would fix this
>> problem I'm not convinced that this justifies the amount of work
>> involved. So, until the mailing list is flooded with people who can't
>> download setup.exe because we don't have https access, I am satisfied
>> with not doing anything.
>
>That's too bad. Using SSL would nearly eliminate the risk of a MITM
>delivering a bogus setup.exe in place of the real thing to some
>unsuspecting user.
>
>As an alternative to setting up SSL on cygwin.com, what about the idea
>of crypto-signing (e.g. with gnupg) every release of setup.exe, and then
>posting the signature alongside the binary? I know I would breathe a
>little easier if I were able to positively verify the authenticity of a
>given setup.exe binary.
>
>The public key would need to be distributed via channels other than just
>cygwin.com, to make it more difficult to spoof. Fortunately, there are a
>number of public PGP/GPG key servers to fill that purpose.
Oh. Are we still talking about this? I drifted off.
Somebody please wake me when all of this tempest in a bikeshed is over.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -