X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Spam-Score:	-86.934
Message-ID:	<4B9008A5.7090302@sh.cvut.cz>
Date:	Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:23:17 +0100
From:	=?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= <v DOT haisman AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Time for new Binutils release?
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,
could the responsible packager release recent/latest Binutils into the wild,
please? I am having problems using log4cplus library on Cygwin with stock
Cygwin ld. It has something to do with the pseudo relocations and such, IIRC.
Do Cygwin package maintainers not have the same issues with their packages?

- --
VH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEAREIAAYFAkuQCKQACgkQr2CghdezFMmQpwCgrXhyb5HWvfKnfRBIX6sIBgGj
b7EAn39Lp2rgRtTgYWURu8ILRV1/0dov
=uUQM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -