X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4B8DD7DF.6090006@redhat.com>
References:	<4B8DCB6C DOT 3010207 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <2bf229d31003021901g4c7f3b8fu340c1be2886d5f3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B8DD7DF DOT 6090006 AT redhat DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 06:27:41 -0500
Message-ID:	<2bf229d31003030327v7d350815qcecde7c0557f8cfa@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: "tail" command does not work as advertised
From:	Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

>> Note that the +N notation is specific to --lines=, not the '-n'
>> shorthand.
>
> Wrong - the +N notation also works with -n:
>
> ps -a | tail -n +5

Ah, I was confused since 'tail -5' still works, but:

> This is a side affect of the change to the newer POSIX standard.
>  http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Old-tail-plus-N-syntax-now-fails

This explains it.

Cheers!

Chris

-- 
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -