X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<21202.67532.qm@web19007.mail.hk2.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:14:58 +0800 (HKT)
From:	Dave Lee <mailtolky AT yahoo DOT com DOT hk>
Subject:	Re: Problem in calling _stat() on Cygwin 1.7
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<op.u8sfa4il1e62zd@merlin.emma.line.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

> If it (meddling with internal affairs, such as using _stat)
> hurts too much, then don't do it (use stat instead, it's
> standardized).

An off-topic question: on system where both XXX() and _XXX() are available (where XXX = open, read, write, access, chmod, ... etc), can one assume what _XXX() does, and that _XXX() behaves the same as XXX()?

Thanks for help.

Dave Lee



      


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -