X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:41:11 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7.2] change in cygpath -w behaviour?
Message-ID:	<20100222174111.GW5683@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<416096c61002220742o50cee833paff2efe804e2a400 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<416096c61002220742o50cee833paff2efe804e2a400@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 22 15:42, Andy Koppe wrote:
> It seems there's been a change in 'cygpath -w' behaviour. Is this intentional?
> 
> On 1.7.1 (with C:\ as Cygwin root):
> $ cygpath -w /tmp
> C:\tmp
> 
> On 1.7.2s(0.222/5/3) 20100219 12:56:31:
> $ cygpath -w /tmp
> \\?\C:\tmp
> 
> The latter breaks scripts that aren't sufficiently careful about
> backslash quoting, because "\\?\C:\tmp" loses a vital backslash during
> quote removal.

Thanks for the report.  Should be fixed in CVS.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -