delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/02/16/15:28:59

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <D253509714CD4C1F809B55DD8FB12745@Elshadai>
From: "Stephen Grant Brown" <sg_brown AT mcmedia DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <9A331329F0534CADB99CA090E20A824A AT Elshadai> <4B757347 DOT 8050006 AT cygwin DOT com> <237C0953DAD04B77A03740269852B419 AT Elshadai> <4B75E029 DOT 9020500 AT cygwin DOT com> <86AE606BC4C2493EBE6359C3A52F4E40 AT Elshadai> <4B78CE89 DOT 6060606 AT cygwin DOT com> <B83250B1E53C4E39BBA29B04116A22EE AT Elshadai> <4B7AEE63 DOT 6010301 AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:28:35 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Larry,
Thanks for your quick response.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)"
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337


> On 02/16/2010 01:20 AM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
>> Again no output from the 1.7 cygcheck
>>
>> Is the cygwin1.dll from 1.5 still in memory and being accessed by the
>> cygcheck in 1.7 when I renamed it?
>>
>> Am I correct in saying that I am not getting any output from the
>> cygcheck from 1.7?
>>
>> How do you suggest I run cygcheck?
>
> I'm not sure.  'cygcheck' doesn't require 'cygwin1.dll' to run.  It's a 
> pure
> Win32 program.  If it's not running, that points to something local 
> getting
> in it's way.  Again, I can only think of BLODA or other type of security
> application/service.  Is there anything else you're running that fits this
> description?  I also find it odd that 'cygcheck' from 1.5 runs while 1.7
> doesn't.  Perhaps the output (_attached_) from the 1.5 version will 
> provide
> some insight if you can't find anything else causing the problem.
>
> -- 
> Larry Hall

I have had symantec running before but I have removed it to the best of my 
ability
(I have not reformatted the hard disk and started with a fresh install of 
windows.)

cygcheck from 1.5 produces output.
cygcheck from 1.7 does not.
How does cygcheck determine the location of the cygin installation to check?
Can I use the cygcheck from 1.5 to check the installation of  1.7?

Once again, thank you for your effort in helping me.

Yours Sincerely
Stephen Grant Brown


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019