Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/02/15/13:15:27
2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote:
>>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>>
>>>> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
>>>
>>> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
>>> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi
>>> testsuite have the same issue with crept in "."
>>
>>neither 20100214 works for libffi testsuite...
>
> Maybe you're missing Corinna's request for a simple test case to
> track this down. =A0We don't anticipate that this will be fixed until
> someone takes the time to narrow this down.
I'm not ignorant, just incompetent in such a complex situation. I
don't like being addressed in a manner as this if you don't mind me
saying so.
I will stop reporting gcc and cygwin results, as I obviously irritated
you, unless I misinterpret your, in my opinion strong statement above.
I don't need such behaviour and I conclude from your statement above
that you don't want my reports either, so that's fine then.
I see now, however, that Corinna seems to have found a bug she
introduced; I'm all happy she did. My incentive for reporting this
issue was for you guys to make an informed decision, of introducing a
regression, or you may call it a bug if you will, not to solve any of
my problems, I have non related to this.
thanks
--=20
Cheers,
/ChJ
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -