X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<815356.61157.qm@web35908.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:07:35 -0800 (PST)
From:	Javier <gweobia AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Bug: select() does not modify timeout (arg 5) on return
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20100211030624.GB2654@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> I believe actually made a conscious decision not to alter
> the arguments when
> I first wrote select().=9A However, times have changed
> so it probably makes
> sense to alter it to be more linux-like now.
>=20
> I'll look into doing that.

Can we expect it to be patched in next version? Any plans to release next v=
ersion soon?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -