X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:40:17 +0100
Message-ID:	<5460e3331002102240t20248f5en581227dd1d8ae3f0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Fwd: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...
From:	Christian Joensson <christian DOT joensson AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

maybe this would have been appropriate, sorry for the other postings...


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Christian Joensson
Date: 2010/2/10
Subject: Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100207 & 201002=
10...
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Kopia: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>


2010/2/10 Christian Joensson:
> 2010/2/10 Christian Joensson:
>> Maybe(?) I should have posted here instead of e-mailing Dave privately...
>>
>> /ChJ
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Christian Joensson
>> Date: 2010/2/10
>> Subject: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100207 & 2010021=
0...
>> To: Dave Korn
>>
>>
>> Just FYI... the latest posted test results, at
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg00907.html, shows a
>> substatntial amount of FAILs for libffi, this is with cygwin1.dll
>> snapshot 20100207 (I also checked briefly using 20100210, also gives a
>> lot of FAILs in libffi), rolling back to cygwin1.dll of 1.7.1-1, the
>> results are back to normal.. Something crept up between 1.7.1-1 and
>> 20100207 snapshot that simply makes a mess with libffi test results.
>> That's the FYI...
>>
>
> A "diff ../../../objdir-156618/libffi.log testsuite/libffi.log" (where
> the first file is the log file when using the cygwin1.dll snapshot
> 20100207 and the second file is using the 1.7.1-1 one) gives me this
> (as an example):
>
> 1c1
> < Test Run By chj on Tue Feb =A09 13:17:04 2010
> ---
>> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 11:39:41 2010
> 115,118c115,118
> < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17. 12
> < res: 8 17. 12
> < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17. 12
> < res: 8 17. 12
> ---
>> 7 8 9 1 9 3: 8 17 12
>> res: 8 17 12
>> 7 8 9 1 9 3: 8 17 12
>> res: 8 17 12
>
>
> Note the crept in "." (dot) which is symptomatic for the situation...
> if this rings a bell in anyone's ear?

well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin developers' list.. but

20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...

--
Cheers,

/ChJ



--=20
Cheers,

/ChJ

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -