X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:02:45 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: dlclose not calling destructors of static variables.
Message-ID:	<20100129200245.GA20829@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4B61732F DOT 4030804 AT gmail DOT com> <4B62DDE6 DOT 5070106 AT gmail DOT com> <4B62F118 DOT 8010305 AT gmail DOT com> <20100129184514 DOT GA9550 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B633439 DOT 6030609 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4B633439.6030609@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:17:13PM +0000, Andrew West wrote:
>O.k. I'll check out the changes on Monday, but one minor point.
>Shouldn't the atexit stuff be run after all the destructors have run?

Not if the output from the linux version of your program is to be
believed.  I originally had the atexit stuff run after the dtors and saw
this:

testlib:: stop
TestClass::~TestClass()

Putting the atexit stuff first reversed the order, making it match
linux.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -