X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:56:11 -0500
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Python 2.6 ?
Message-id:	<20100126135611.GA2212@tishler.net>
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4B5EADFB DOT 4010200 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
MIME-version:	1.0
In-reply-to:	<4B5EADFB.4010200@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yaakov,

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:55:23AM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> What are your plans for upgrading the distro Python to 2.6?

I was waiting for Cygwin 1.7 to be released.  I guess I can't use that
excuse anymore... :,)

> I'm finally starting to see some programs require 2.6 now, so I think
> the time has finally come that to consider an upgrade.

Agreed, especially since the Python web site indicates the following:

    The current production versions are Python 2.6.4 and Python 3.1.1.

> Of course, any upgrade to Python affects a lot of packages,

Wow, I didn't realize there were so many Cygwin packages dependent on
Python:

    $ wget -q -O - http://mirror.nyi.net/cygwin/setup.ini | \
    grep '^requires:.* python' setup.ini | wc -l
    54

> so I hope that we can coordinate this in order to have a smooth
> transition.

What do you propose?  Should I release a Python 2.6 as experimental, use
alternatives, or another approach?

BTW, is the threading workaround mentioned in the following post still
necessary?

    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00831.html

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -