X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:57:59 +0100
Message-ID:	<eb3a2d501001212357o79408d51x71de43caf495f663@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Package Maintainer List
From:	"Gary ." <cygwin AT garydjones DOT name>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 21 13:43, Gary . wrote:
> > Is the list at http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint current?
[...]
> > links-1.00pre20-1-cygwin.patch file:
> > +----- version 1.00pre20-1 -----
> > +- New maintainer, 2007-08-12 Jari Aalto.
> > +- New upstream release.
>
> Oh, right, I fixed that in cygwin-pkg-maint.

Thanks.

> > So now I don't know if the list is to be trusted...
>
> The file is maintained by mere human beings...

Oh, that's ok. It was just that that was really the first one I looked at,
and so it wasn't clear to me if the list was being maintained or was,
itself, orphaned.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -