X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B57AC48.7030909@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:22:16 -0600
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Design issue with new MS-DOS style path warning?
References:	<81D39E818991E549B1F66EB6A7D18422BE8626 AT AVSMOEXCL02 DOT activision DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<81D39E818991E549B1F66EB6A7D18422BE8626@AVSMOEXCL02.activision.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 20/01/2010 19:11, Batson, Chuck wrote:
> Or perhaps I'm completely missing something fundamental and you're about
> to set me straight.  :-)

Exactly.  Bottom line: it doesn't matter how you launch the command.  If 
you're running a Cygwin command, then use Cygwin paths.  You have been 
(and will continue to be) warned. :-)


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -