X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B57A8DE.3090903@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:07:42 -0600
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ATTN: perl-Tk maintainer RE: perl-Tk is broken
References:	<786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36836E65 AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <4B5777F4 DOT 3010104 AT x-ray DOT at>
In-Reply-To:	<4B5777F4.3010104@x-ray.at>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 20/01/2010 15:39, Reini Urban wrote:
> Do you need Win32 native Tk or just x Tk?
> My patch was just to support Win32 Tk. I have no time for this in the
> next month.

Nor should you need to.  I maintain the perl-Tk package, and we use the 
X11 interface because this is Cygwin, not ActivePerl.

> x Tk aka the perl-tk package just has to be recompiled against latest
> perl, cygwin and gcc.

I'll admit that I haven't used perl-Tk in a while, but I just tested 
/usr/bin/widget with perl-5.10.1-2 and see nothing wrong.


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -