X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4B576D1F.9090906@acm.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:52:47 -0800
From:	David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	orpie setup.hint problem
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

The requires: line for orpie mentions lapack. I think this should be 
liblapack0?

For some reason, setup never believes that lapack is installed. It keeps 
listing it for installation in the Preview pane. I install it each time, 
but it is never listed as an installed package by cygcheck. orpie is the 
only package that depends on lapack.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

All things are either sacred or profane.
The former to ecclesiasts bring gain;
The latter to the devil appertain.
                 -- Dumbo Omohundro

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -