X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B481B64.4090502@fastmail.fm>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:00:04 -0500
From:	Raman Gupta <rocketraman AT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.7.1-1 noacl on samba share has incorrect directory write bit
References:	<4B454550 DOT 9020806 AT fastmail DOT fm> <4B454E96 DOT 7060009 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B45739C DOT 4060807 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107180214 DOT GP23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B462AFD DOT 8030809 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107195022 DOT GQ23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B463D68 DOT 1070906 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107200946 DOT GR23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B46431E DOT 7050101 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100108103215 DOT GB27916 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B47626B DOT 4060104 AT fastmail DOT fm> <4B4793BC DOT 10401 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4B4793BC.10401@cygwin.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 01/08/2010 03:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 01/08/2010 11:50 AM, Raman Gupta wrote:
>> With the dro option, the latter would correctly remove the write bit on
>> foo in /tmp/from_noacl.
>
> So perhaps you can explain why setting "acl" isn't the solution here?

Unfortunately, acl mode is unusable in a non-domain environment as all 
the files have ownership/permissions relative to the server user/group 
rather than the client workstation user/group.

Reference this mailing list discussion back in 2000:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-12/msg00546.html

It appears this discussion is actually what led Corinna to add the 
smbntsec mount option. The issues are summarized well in this mail 
from Charles Wilson:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-12/msg00756.html

Cheers,
Raman

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -