X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B47156C.9000308@tlinx.org>
Date:	Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:22:20 -0800
From:	Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 ThunderBrowse/3.2.6.8 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: find utils (updatedb) crashes on invalid win symlink
References:	<4B3E8B96 DOT 4020109 AT tlinx DOT org> <20100107124201 DOT GF23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20100107124201.GF23972@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-Stationery:	0.4.10
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
>> I'm not sure, but I think symlinkD's are real directories with a file in them
>> that points to the target.
> 
> Nope.  All of the aforementioned Windows objects are reparse points.
> 
> 
> Corinna
----
	Ug...As soon as I unmounted the invalid drive and mounted something
valid, the problem went away.  Very weird.  Now it's not coming back.

	I just reinstalled Win 7 (for the 4th time, but who's counting!) last weekend, so my problems may have been 'eaten' by my reinstall. 

	I suppose I could try other ways to break it again, but... 
honestly, I'm not sure I really want to, given all the hassles I 
have getting things *not* to break!

	I'm trying out a roaming profile to see if I can keep some of my
settings/personal registry through my next reinstall (at this point I think
it's just a matter of when, not if).

	Overall cygwin is probably at least as stable as the OS ;-).

	Ok, maybe a bit more.  :-)

-l


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -