X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:46:17 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: "mount -a" has no effect on the cygdrive prefix
Message-ID:	<20091230114617.GA32322@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<COL102-W53B7D7862508B98E5C7168B5800 AT phx DOT gbl> <20091224111047 DOT GB30006 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <COL102-W246795B5594B243F68ABBFB5790 AT phx DOT gbl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<COL102-W246795B5594B243F68ABBFB5790@phx.gbl>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec 29 16:27, Karl M wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:10:47 +0100
> > From: corinna-cygwin
> > Subject: Re: "mount -a" has no effect on the cygdrive prefix
> >
> > On Dec 23 08:32, Karl M wrote:
> >> Hi All...
> >>
> >> With the last 1.7.0 version and with a clean 1.7.1 install on an XP Pro SP3 machine,
> >> if I edit my fstab to change my cygdrive prefix and then do a "mount -a", my mounts
> >> as shown by the mount command or catting mtab are not updated. I only tried it with
> >> the cygdrive prefix, not with other mounts.
> >
> > The cygdrive prefix is explicitely ignored when calling mount -a.
> > The problem is, I'm not sure anymore *why* I did it that way.
> > I added it to my TODO list, at least to figure out the reason...
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Corinna
> >
> Hi Corinna...
>  
> Did you figure out the reason?

I know the reason, I just don't work on it yet.  It's on the TODO list
for the new year.

> When you look at it, could you remove the inconsistant posix=0 from mount and mount -m
> output for the prefix where posix=0 is the default.

No, I don't think so.  posix=1 is the generic default, posix=0 gets
noted explicitely.  That should be kept for consistency.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -