X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B3A36D0.3030102@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:05:20 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Bernd Bartmann <bernd DOT bartmann AT gmail DOT com>
CC:	dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com, Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Fwd: No go after update to 1.7.1
References:	<6c18a4f0912251015k48ff2266l8fca37fc2543772e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091226233558 DOT GB21254 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912270223w675ea650k15fadf8eb4c7de15 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091227151902 DOT GB27191 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912270949o5460c1ceq33f9e93d476614a2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <416096c60912270956l3a82fb8fu3a62d6532dc1988a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6c18a4f0912271000i3c5f5ecewccf1bb77e30d88b4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B37E68C DOT 9000304 AT cygwin DOT com> <20091227233155 DOT GA12367 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912280230k601eca9me32c056e09117866 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6c18a4f0912290754h34c5a28s31091eeb6af1cc5a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<6c18a4f0912290754h34c5a28s31091eeb6af1cc5a@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

[  Cc'ing the list back in now, FTR.  ]

Bernd Bartmann wrote:
>> Looks like your post didn't make it through to the list; there's nothing in
>> the archive for your message with ID
>> <6c18a4f0912280230k601eca9me32c056e09117866 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>.  Probably
>> something somewhere down the line thought a .csv attachment was suspicious,
>> malicious, spammy-looking or overly-large, so I'm writing off-list to ask for
>> a copy.  Can't promise it'll show anything, but I'll take a look.
> 
>  Thanks Dave for pointing this out. Below you'll find my original
> post. Hopefully the attachments will arrive as well.

  We have a suspect:

> "11:09:08,3362588","bash.exe","3396","CreateFileMapping","C:\Programme\BitDefender\BitDefender 2010\Active Virus Control\midas32-v2_58\PLUGIN_NT.M32","SUCCESS","SyncType: SyncTypeOther"

  That's listed on BLODA.  You may be able to work around by following the
rebase advice discussed in these threads:

"BitDefender again"
  http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-08/threads.html#00771
  http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-09/threads.html#00009

"Confusion re: use of rebaseall vs. rebase to relieve BitDefender woes"
  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/threads.html#00159

(I left a question unanswered in one of those threads about what the effects
of relocating the cygwin1 dll to a low base address could be; the brief answer
would be "largely theoretical, unless you're the type who does massive number
crunching with huge arrays in fortran, or similar".)

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -