X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B38DE2B.1080401@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:34:51 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: run2.exe segfaults when GDI and X11 elements are present
References:	<4B262E7E DOT 4090001 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B280C6C DOT 90902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B35E98A DOT 3090500 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B3621EE DOT 4090108 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B363968 DOT 1090609 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B364DCA DOT 2030601 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B365F6A DOT 1090605 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B366863 DOT 9070803 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B36E851 DOT 5060205 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B372F4A DOT 2000305 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B377101 DOT 5050602 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B37C69A DOT 7070003 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B37E04D DOT 7080201 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B37E2B9 DOT 8020801 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B386A9E DOT 9030102 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B38BA90 DOT 7030704 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B38CF63 DOT 5000409 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To:	<4B38CF63.5000409@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Charles Wilson wrote:
> NOW I see the coredump -- which is occurring inside the xml parsing
> subroutines. I *HOPE* this is an entirely different bug than the one
> that started this thread.
>
> I'll followup with another message after I start debugging the new
> test1.xml coredump.

This was an unsigned underflow error. Both i and buffer->buf_used are
unsigned:

     for (i = 0; i < buffer->buf_used - 3; i++, p++)

Imagine what happens when buffer->buf_used is "2". Fixed in r26.

Now, back to test.xml with DISPLAY unset...which I can reproduce. Should
be an easy fix.

--
Chuck

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -