X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B383735.9010106@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:42:29 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: My"C" Compiled can't compile "{}"
References:	<4B381883 DOT 7030002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4B382F92 DOT 4000806 AT gmail DOT com> <4B382F54 DOT 9020202 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4B382F54.9020202@columbus.rr.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Paul McFerrin wrote:

> From my years of experiences, "{}" is the simplest version of a
> to-be-compiled C program.  

  No it isn't.

> It is syntaxily correct.  

  No it isn't.

> in any case, the above DID work in 1.7-68.

  No it didn't.  Your code is gibberish and has never worked on anything anywhere.


  You're probably having a terrible mis-remembering accident based on having
once seen something like "main(){}" somewhere.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -