delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Merits of ClearCase |
Date: | Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:38:11 -0700 |
Lines: | 19 |
Message-ID: | <hg5m53$8c3$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <26769438 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B2557EC DOT 5070506 AT gmail DOT com> <26770209 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B257717 DOT 4070503 AT gmail DOT com> <hg45o8$rvf$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <4B2638FD DOT 3040200 AT byu DOT net> <26778349 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B2649D0 DOT 7010705 AT byu DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4B2649D0.7010705@byu.net> |
X-Stationery: | 0.4.10 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 12/14/2009 07:21 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > That's a workaround, not a solution. Any VCS that requires an O(n) (n > as the number of files being labeled) labeling post-processing pass in > order to create enough records in the database to track commits > atomically, when there are O(1) solutions like git where commits are > atomic _without any additional effort), is just too slow to be worth > anything in my opinion. > > Besides, git is open source, clearcase is not. If git doesn't do what > you want, then you can patch it. If clearcase doesn't do what you > want, too bad. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion - which, of course, means that we are entitled to ours. Nobody's forcing you to use Clearcase... Oh your work uses it. Well when you come down to it really that was a voluntary decision of yours too. -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> I(nternal) R(evenue) S(ervice): We've got what it takes to take what you've got. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |