Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/11/29/12:58:11
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Therefore I put them
> back in -63.
Hum... This is strange. I always upgrade after reading your
announcements, and never noticed this behavior. It seems that it starts
from 24-25 November 2009.
Any way, thanks for clarification.
> Apart from that, I don't see the extra permissions when creating the
> patched foo.txt. In other words, I can't reproduce it, at least not on
> W7 under UAC.
In my case, it is XPSP3, and it happens systematically whenever one uses
'patch' command. But:
$ ls -lrt foo.txt
-rw-r--r--+ 1 ... 7 28 Nov 18:03 foo.txt
$ tar -cjvf t.tar.bz2 foo.txt
$ rm foo.txt
$ tar -xjvf t.tar.bz2
$ ls -lrt
-rw-r--r-- 1 ... 7 29 Nov 18:38 foo.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 ... 138 29 Nov 18:38 t.tar.bz2
After archived in a tar-ball , it loses the extra '+'!
> What are the permissions of the parent directory? In other words,
> what does "icacls ." print in this scenario?
On XPSP3 it seems that only 'cacls' is on the system. So, from my home:
$ cacls .
C:\cygwin-2\home\angelo HOMEPC\graziosi:F
BUILTIN\Users:R
Everyone:R
(Just for completeness, I did all these tests also as 'root', with same
results.)
Ciao,
Angelo.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -